Consequences 4 Life Spring Shoes

Watch a video on shoe technology

The Future Is Now.
WaveSpring™ Technology is here

Experience the WaveSpring™ difference!

Spira's™ patented WaveSpring™ technology may be the most significant advancement ever achieved in the footwear industry.*

WaveSpring™ returns energy with every step.
Ray Fredericksen, president of Sports Biomechanics, Inc. compares typical midsole materials found in many athletic shoes to running in sand. While initially perceived as soft and comfortable, these shoes require the wearer to exert greater effort. Muscles must work harder, causing fatigue and increasing the risk of injury.

Unlike traditional shoe midsoles made primarily of foams, rubber compounds, or polymers, WaveSpring™ technology stores and disburses energy with every step. Testing performed by an independent source reports that 87% - 96% of the energy is returned from the WaveSpring™. This is the highest energy return score for any midsole material ever tested.**

WaveSpring™ is light and compact.
The WaveSpring™ is laterally stable, lightweight, compact, and can easily fit into a typical shoe midsole. The technology is in the heel and forefoot of the shoe. As such, it has the appearance of a normal shoe. Looking from the outside no one will know you have a spring in your step but you!

WaveSpring™ technology will not break down.
Traditional midsole materials work through compression and often breakdown quickly. The WaveSpring™ is mechanical. The spring will outlast the shoe. The wearer will have a "new shoe" feel from the first day it is worn to the last!

"Unlike rubbers and polymers, the springs have an almost infinite fatigue life. The shoe will fall apart before the spring performance degrades."
Popular Mechanics magazine
Shoe Technology Review, July 2003

"I feel it is the first technological advance that has been truly meaningful in the shoe industry in many years."
Donald A. Chu Ph.D., PT, ATC CSCS
Director, Athletic Training & Rehabilitation
Stanford University

*Patented and patents pending.
**Sports Biomechanics, Inc., Michigan State University, May 2001

Experience the WaveSpring™ difference!

Go To:

Survey
Testimonials
Complete Shoe Page

Thanks for stopping by. Below we have a survey from 123 customers who gave feedback on our shoes.

We also have some very impressive testimonials that make us feel good that we are working with such a good

company offering such a helpful product.

Click here to see more styles

Here are the results from the Shoe Spring Post-Purchase Customer Survey

The institute for policy and econimic development (IPED) ath the University of Texas.
Overall, response to the shoe was very positive. Approximately 47% of all customers
receiving surveys responded withn the three week period.

In general, the survey instrument measured custoers overall satisfaction on a variety
of issues concerning the shoe. These included overall comfort, durability, price and a
variety of other measures concerning the purchase experience. The results of the survey
show that the great majority of respondents seem to be satisfied with the product (93.4
percent), would purchase the shoes again (89.6%), and would recoend the
shoes to a friend (90.8%)
Survey Says
Age Groups	Frequency	Percent	Activity	Frequency
30 and below	9	7.1	Running	58
31-50	49	38.9	Walking	102
50-79	68	54	Aerobics	13
			Cycling	17
Sex	Frequency	Percent	Cross Training	20
Male	83	66.4	Weight Training	31
Female	42	33.6	Court Sports	4
			Baseball	2
Weight of Shoe	Frequency	Percent	Softball	1
Above average	43	35	Football	0
Excellent	59	48	Basketball	3
			Soccer	1
Style / Appearance	Frequency	Percent	Golf	6
Above average	44	35.8	Work	20
Excellent	37	30

Overall Comfort	Frequency	Percent	Sports-Related injury	Frequency	Percent
Above average	32	26	Yes	24	19.2
Excellent	78	63	NO	101	80.8

Overall Cushioning	Frequency	Percent	Extra protection from Injury	Frequency	Percent
Above average	30	24.4	Yes	75	68.8
Excellent	82	66.7	NO	27	24.8

Overall Stability	Frequency	Percent	Reduces Fatigue on Legs/Feet	Frequency	Percent
Above average	45	36.9	Yes	104	86.7
Excellent	60	49.2	NO	16	13.3

Overall Cushioning	Frequency	Percent	Experience with ShoeSpring	Frequency	Percent
Above average	30	24.4	Dissatisfied	8	6.5
Excellent	82	66.7	Satisfied / Extremely Satisfied	113	91.1

Overall Cushioning	Frequency	Percent	Overall Experience	Frequency	Percent
Above average	30	24.4	Dissatisfied	4	3.3
Excellent	82	66.7	Satisfied / Extremely Satisfied	113	93.4

Purchase Again?	Frequency	Percent	Recommend to a Friend	Frequency	Percent
Yes	103	89.6	Yes	109	90.8
No	12	10.4	No	11	9.2


Research & Development Consultants

Sport Biomechanics, Inc
Ray Fredericksen,

Testimonials:

Dr. L David Williams, D.P.M., Ed.D. Diabetic patients benefit

Dr. Oliver R. Smith, JR., D.C. Chiropractic patients benefit

Richard B Novick, D.D.S. Chronic Low Back Problem

David A Welch, Collegiate Coach, 2 time Olympic Trials Qualifier, 6 time all American

Chris Rowley El Paso, TX Running Benefits

Micheal Cohen Atorney at Law, Parkinson's Disease and back to work

Jason Rabedeaux UTEP Mens Head Basketball Coach Increase in Vertical Leap (Basketball)

Chris Wallace General Manager Celtics Walking on air

Greg Lackey, Assistant Basketball Coach University of Denver, Amazed by durability

Mika Laaksonen, UTEP Throws Coack, Back problem(Thorasic outlet Sndrome) and (Knee Cartilage Damage) help

Mark Balsiger, El Paso TX, Battle against Father Time..

Bob Kitchens, Head Track Coach UTEP, Shoespring Delivers - no gimics

Felix Hinojosa, Head Cross Country Coach , Quicker Recovery, Less fatiqued

Matt Farris, Soccer Benefits